Portfolio · PF-DT
The unified e-services platform and app, digital signatures and e-litigation, the national indicators portal, the plan tracker and the national development forum.
incl. SYP 242.5M unallocated reserve
47% of budget
Estimate at completion
14% realised
was 79 in May
Manager
Basel Al-Mahayni
Director General, Digital Government Services & Portfolio Manager, Digital Government Services & Data
Owner
Eng. Khaled Al-Kayyali
Deputy President, Digital Transformation
Programmes7 projects
Government e-Services Programme76%National Data & Plan Follow-up Programme32%AI insight
Most of it comes from “Unified Government e-Services Platform” (SPI 0.87) and “National Statistical Indicators & Open Data Portal” (SPI 0.89). Fixing those two lifts the portfolio towards 83 within two quarters.
Σ each project’s relative weight × its actual progress, under the approved project weight model
The project’s weight from the model, its relative weight among the portfolio’s counted projects, and what it adds
| Project | Project weight | Relative weight | Actual progress | Weight × progress |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unified Government e-Services Platform | 88.0 | 21.8% | 58% | 12.6% |
| National Statistical Indicators & Open Data Portal | 70.0 | 17.3% | 62% | 10.7% |
| Medium-Term Plan Implementation Tracker (ministries & governorates) | 66.0 | 16.3% | 1% | 0.2% |
| e-Litigation & Judicial Notification Platform — Release 2 | 63.0 | 15.6% | 91% | 14.2% |
| Government Services Mobile App — New Release | 63.0 | 15.6% | 64% | 10.0% |
| Digital Signature & e-Verification of Government Documents — Phase 1 | 54.0 | 13.4% | 100% | 13.4% |
| National Development & Reconstruction Forum 2027Left out — proposed | 59.0 | — | 0% | — |
| Portfolio progress | 61.1% | |||
61.1%
Portfolio progress = Σ (project relative weight × actual progress). Relative weight = the project’s weight ÷ the weights of the counted projects, so they add up to 100%.
The health score from eight weighted dimensions, and the schedule and cost indices over six months.
Score × weight = points
| Dimension | Score | Weight | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| Schedule | 68 | 20% | 13.6 |
| Cost | 84 | 20% | 16.8 |
| Risk | 62 | 15% | 9.3 |
| Scope | 80 | 10% | 8.0 |
| Quality | 82 | 10% | 8.2 |
| Resources | 66 | 10% | 6.6 |
| Stakeholders | 78 | 5% | 3.9 |
| Benefits | 76 | 10% | 7.6 |
| Total | 74 | ||
Health-score trend
May – October 2026
May – October 2026
0.92
Watch
Schedule performance index
Progress 61% / Planned 64%
0.98
On track
Cost performance index
Actual spend SYP 2.5B
Both indices over time
risk across, strategic value up, bubble size by budget. Click a bubble for a quick look at the project.
Portfolio project map
Rank the projects for funding; your order is kept and goes to the 2027 planning cycle.
Portfolio priorities 2026–2027
Why the portfolio exists: the strategic objectives it serves and the KPIs its projects move.
69% achieved of a 80% target1 project contribute
72% achieved of a 85% target4 projects contribute
70% achieved of a 80% target2 projects contribute
Where the budget goes, why the forecast differs from it, and the value it returns.
Each programme’s gap between its projects’ budget and their forecast
| Category | Change | Running total |
|---|---|---|
| Approved budget | SYP 5.2B | SYP 5.2B |
| Unallocated reserve | −SYP 242.5M | SYP 5B |
| Government e-Services Programme | +SYP 62.9M | SYP 5B |
| National Data & Plan Follow-up Programme | +SYP 28.3M | SYP 5.1B |
| Projects outside a programme | SYP 0 | SYP 5.1B |
| Estimate at completion | SYP 5.1B | SYP 5.1B |
Budget use
SYP 16B
Expected value
| Category | Value | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Time saved | SYP 5.4B | 34% |
| Beneficiary satisfaction | SYP 4.2B | 26% |
| Cost saving | SYP 3.5B | 22% |
| Revenue | SYP 2.9B | 18% |
| Total | SYP 16B | 100% |
Value realised
SYP 2.3B
Expected value SYP 16B
78% of what was planned by today
A programme’s performance is computed from its projects. Click a project for a quick look.
PG-01 · 4 projects
Government e-Services Programme
Planned to date 78%
PG-02 · 2 projects
National Data & Plan Follow-up Programme
Planned to date 37%
Display options
| Unified Government e-Services PlatformPRJ-2026-014 | PG-01 | 4Execution | At risk | 58% | 21.8% | P1P1 · Top priority — score 91 of 100 | SYP2.2B | SYP2.3B+4.2% | 0.87Schedule performance index · 0.87 | 0.96Cost performance index · 0.96 | Risk score · Weak |
| Medium-Term Plan Implementation Tracker (ministries & governorates)PRJ-2026-023 | PG-02 | 2Initiation | On track | 1% | 16.3% | P1P1 · Top priority — score 76 of 100 | SYP700M | SYP700M0.0% | 1.00Schedule performance index · 1.00 | 1.00Cost performance index · 1.00 | Risk score · Good |
| National Development & Reconstruction Forum 2027PRJ-2026-035 | — | 1Pre-start | On track | 0% | — | P3P3 · Medium priority — score 52 of 100 | SYP600M | SYP600M0.0% | 1.00Schedule performance index · 1.00 | 1.00Cost performance index · 1.00 | Risk score · Good |
| National Statistical Indicators & Open Data PortalPRJ-2026-016 | PG-02 | 4Execution | At risk | 62% | 17.3% | P2P2 · High priority — score 72 of 100 | SYP537.5M | SYP565.8M+5.3% | 0.89Schedule performance index · 0.89 | 0.95Cost performance index · 0.95 | Risk score · Fair |
| e-Litigation & Judicial Notification Platform — Release 2PRJ-2026-008 | PG-01 | 4Execution | On track | 91% | 15.6% | P1P1 · Top priority — score 80 of 100 | SYP460M | SYP451M−2.0% | 1.01Schedule performance index · 1.01 | 1.02Cost performance index · 1.02 | Risk score · Good |
| Government Services Mobile App — New ReleasePRJ-2026-015 | PG-01 | 4Execution | On track | 64% | 15.6% | P1P1 · Top priority — score 78 of 100 | SYP315M | SYP302.9M−3.8% | 1.02Schedule performance index · 1.02 | 1.04Cost performance index · 1.04 | Risk score · Good |
| Digital Signature & e-Verification of Government Documents — Phase 1PRJ-2026-031 | PG-01 | 5Closure | On track | 100% | 13.4% | P1P1 · Top priority — score 75 of 100 | SYP205M | SYP199M−2.9% | 1.00Schedule performance index · 1.00 | 1.03Cost performance index · 1.03 | Risk score · Excellent |
| Total · 7 | SYP5B | SYP5.1B |
Open threats across the portfolio’s projects. Click a cell on the map to filter the list.
11 risks
Impact
| Probability \ Impact | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 0 · Low | 0 · Medium | 0 · High | 0 · Critical | 0 · Critical |
| 4 | 0 · Low | 0 · Medium | 0 · Medium | 2 · High | 0 · Critical |
| 3 | 0 · Low | 0 · Low | 4 · Medium | 2 · Medium | 0 · High |
| 2 | 0 · Low | 0 · Low | 2 · Low | 1 · Medium | 0 · Medium |
| 1 | 0 · Low | 0 · Low | 0 · Low | 0 · Low | 0 · Low |
Top risks
Gate decision: National Projects Steering Committee Conditional Go DEC-2026-042Plan tracker passes into planning with conditions
2026-10-26 10:00Gate decision: National Projects Steering Committee Conditional Go DEC-2026-031Corrective plan approved for the unified government e-services platform
2026-09-15 10:00
