Portfolio · PF-TECH

Government Digital Infrastructure & Systems Portfolio

At risk

The backup data centre, the government cloud and cybersecurity, the public financial management system, the civil registry, e-archiving and the government HR system.

What-if scenarios

Approved budget: SYP 9.1B
Actual spend: SYP 6.1B
EAC: SYP 9.4B+3.0%
Expected value: SYP 13B
Health score: 71−3

Manager

Eng. Mazen Kassab

Director General, Government Digital Infrastructure

Owner

Eng. Khaled Al-Kayyali

Deputy President, Digital Transformation

Programmes7 projects

Digital Infrastructure & Cybersecurity Programme⁦69%⁩Integrated Government Systems Programme⁦62%⁩

On track 3At risk 3Off track 1

AI insight

⁦4⁩ projects in this portfolio are pulling its health down

Most of it comes from “Integrated Public Financial Management System — ⁦Phase 1⁩” (SPI ⁦0.82⁩) and “Government Cloud & Ministry Systems Migration” (SPI ⁦0.89⁩). Fixing those two lifts the portfolio towards ⁦80⁩ within two quarters.

Confidence⁦81%⁩

Weighted portfolio progress

Σ each project’s relative weight × its actual progress, under the approved project weight model

What each project adds to portfolio progress

The project’s weight from the model, its relative weight among the portfolio’s counted projects, and what it adds

Project weight

Project	Project weight	Relative weight	Actual progress	Weight × progress
Integrated Public Financial Management System — Phase 1	71.0	⁦16.4%⁩	⁦61%⁩	⁦10.0%⁩
Government Backup Data Centre, Homs — Phase 2	71.0	⁦16.4%⁩	⁦72%⁩	⁦11.8%⁩
Government Cloud & Ministry Systems Migration	69.0	⁦15.9%⁩	⁦47%⁩	⁦7.5%⁩
Government Network Cybersecurity Programme	66.0	⁦15.2%⁩	⁦88%⁩	⁦13.4%⁩
Civil Registry Automation & Governorate Link-up	59.0	⁦13.6%⁩	⁦6%⁩	⁦0.8%⁩
Ministry of Finance e-Archiving	50.0	⁦11.5%⁩	⁦95%⁩	⁦10.9%⁩
Government HR System — Employee Self-Service	48.0	⁦11.1%⁩	⁦100%⁩	⁦11.1%⁩
Portfolio progress				⁦65.4%⁩

How it is computed

⁦65.4%⁩

Portfolio progress = Σ (project relative weight × actual progress). Relative weight = the project’s weight ÷ the weights of the counted projects, so they add up to 100%.

· Proposed and cancelled projects never count.
· Left out of this portfolio now: ⁦0⁩
· For comparison: weighting by budget alone gives ⁦65.4%⁩

Suspended projects

Open the project weight model

Portfolio health & performance

The health score from eight weighted dimensions, and the schedule and cost indices over six months.

Health-score breakdown

Score × weight = points

71At risk

Dimension	Score	Weight	Points
Schedule	66	⁦20%⁩	13.2
Cost	74	⁦20%⁩	14.8
Risk	58	⁦15%⁩	8.7
Scope	78	⁦10%⁩	7.8
Quality	80	⁦10%⁩	8.0
Resources	67	⁦10%⁩	6.7
Stakeholders	76	⁦5%⁩	3.8
Benefits	80	⁦10%⁩	8.0
Total			71

Health-score trend

May – October 2026

7471

Financial & schedule performance

May – October 2026

0.91

Watch

Schedule performance index

Progress ⁦65%⁩ / Planned ⁦70%⁩

0.94

Watch

Cost performance index

Actual spend SYP 6.1B

Both indices over time

Schedule performance index
Cost performance index

Portfolio project map

risk across, strategic value up, bubble size by budget. Click a bubble for a quick look at the project.

Portfolio project map

On track
At risk
Off track

Approved budget · SYP 3.7B

Funding priority order

Rank the projects for funding; your order is kept and goes to the 2027 planning cycle.

1Government Network Cybersecurity ProgrammePRJ-2026-005·Priority score 85On track
2Government Backup Data Centre, Homs — Phase 2PRJ-2026-003·Priority score 82At risk
3Government Cloud & Ministry Systems MigrationPRJ-2026-009·Priority score 77At risk
4Integrated Public Financial Management System — Phase 1PRJ-2026-001·Priority score 74Off track
5Civil Registry Automation & Governorate Link-upPRJ-2026-011·Priority score 66On track
6Ministry of Finance e-ArchivingPRJ-2026-017·Priority score 62At risk

Portfolio priorities 2026–2027

Recover the integrated public financial management systemOff track at SPI 0.82 and blocking civil registry automation and the year-end close.
Host 50% of ministry systems on the government cloud inside SyriaConditional on the Homs backup data centre being ready.
Full compliance with the national cybersecurity controls91% today against a 95% target.

Objectives & KPIs

Why the portfolio exists: the strategic objectives it serves and the KPIs its projects move.

Objectives the portfolio serves

SO-5.1Integrated digital government services for citizensOff track
⁦72%⁩ achieved of a ⁦85%⁩ target1 project contribute
SO-5.2Sound governance and effective follow-up of projects and dataAt risk
⁦85%⁩ achieved of a ⁦90%⁩ target6 projects contribute

Ministry systems hosted on the government cloud

47%

⁦+2⁩

Target 50%⁦94%⁩

Compliance with the national cybersecurity controls

91%

⁦+1⁩

Target 95%⁦96%⁩

Projects following the national delivery methodology

84%

⁦+2⁩

Target 90%⁦93%⁩

Transactions completed at citizen service centres per month

4.1thousand transactions

⁦0⁩

Target 4.5⁦91%⁩

Budget & value

Where the budget goes, why the forecast differs from it, and the value it returns.

From approved budget to estimate at completion

Each programme’s gap between its projects’ budget and their forecast

Total
Increase
Decrease

From approved budget to estimate at completion
Category	Change	Running total
Approved budget	SYP 9.1B	SYP 9.1B
Unallocated reserve	−SYP 307.5M	SYP 8.8B
Digital Infrastructure & Cybersecurity Programme	+SYP 378M	SYP 9.2B
Integrated Government Systems Programme	+SYP 203.8M	SYP 9.4B
Estimate at completion	SYP 9.4B	SYP 9.4B

Budget use

SYP6.1B/ SYP9.1BSYP274.3Mprojected overrun(⁦3.0%⁩)

Actual spend: SYP6.1B
Committed: SYP7.4B
Approved budget: SYP9.1B
Estimate at completion: SYP9.4B

Expected-value mix

SYP 13B

Expected value

Cost savingSYP 5.2B⁦40%⁩
ProductivitySYP 4.7B⁦36%⁩
Time savedSYP 1.8B⁦14%⁩
Beneficiary satisfactionSYP 1.3B⁦10%⁩

Expected-value mix
Category	Value	Share
Cost saving	SYP 5.2B	⁦40%⁩
Productivity	SYP 4.7B	⁦36%⁩
Time saved	SYP 1.8B	⁦14%⁩
Beneficiary satisfaction	SYP 1.3B	⁦10%⁩
Total	SYP 13B	⁦100%⁩

⁦17%⁩

Value realised

SYP 2.2B

Expected value SYP 13B

⁦92%⁩ of what was planned by today

Programmes & projects

A programme’s performance is computed from its projects. Click a project for a quick look.

PG-03 · 3 projects

Digital Infrastructure & Cybersecurity Programme

At risk

⁦4%⁩ behind⁦69%⁩

Planned to date ⁦73%⁩

SYP6.1BSPI0.92CPI0.94Eng. George Haddad

PG-04 · 4 projects

Integrated Government Systems Programme

Off track

⁦6%⁩ behind⁦62%⁩

Planned to date ⁦68%⁩

SYP3BSPI0.89CPI0.94Nour Al-Jabiri

⁦7⁩ results


Government Backup Data Centre, Homs — Phase 2PRJ-2026-003	PG-03	4Execution	At risk	⁦72%⁩	⁦16.4%⁩	P1	SYP3.7B	SYP4.1B⁦+9.9%⁩	0.90	0.91
Integrated Public Financial Management System — Phase 1PRJ-2026-001	PG-04	4Execution	Off track	⁦61%⁩	⁦16.4%⁩	P2	SYP1.6B	SYP1.8B⁦+13.6%⁩	0.82	0.88
Government Cloud & Ministry Systems MigrationPRJ-2026-009	PG-03	4Execution	At risk	⁦47%⁩	⁦15.9%⁩	P1	SYP1.3B	SYP1.3B⁦+3.1%⁩	0.89	0.97
Government Network Cybersecurity ProgrammePRJ-2026-005	PG-03	4Execution	On track	⁦88%⁩	⁦15.2%⁩	P1	SYP965M	SYP936.9M⁦−2.9%⁩	1.02	1.03
Civil Registry Automation & Governorate Link-upPRJ-2026-011	PG-04	3Planning	On track	⁦6%⁩	⁦13.6%⁩	P2	SYP600M	SYP600M⁦0.0%⁩	1.00	1.00
Ministry of Finance e-ArchivingPRJ-2026-017	PG-04	5Closure	At risk	⁦95%⁩	⁦11.5%⁩	P2	SYP355M	SYP355M⁦0.0%⁩	0.95	1.00
Government HR System — Employee Self-ServicePRJ-2026-032	PG-04	5Closure	On track	⁦100%⁩	⁦11.1%⁩	P2	SYP285M	SYP268.9M⁦−5.7%⁩	1.00	1.06
Total · 7							SYP8.8B	SYP9.4B

⁦1⁩–⁦7⁩ of ⁦7⁩

Portfolio risks

Open threats across the portfolio’s projects. Click a cell on the map to filter the list.

Open-risk heat map

8 risks

Risk register

Critical0
High2
Medium6
Low0
Risks 8

Probability

12345

Impact

Open-risk heat map
Probability \ Impact	1	2	3	4	5
5	0 · Low	0 · Medium	0 · High	0 · Critical	0 · Critical
4	0 · Low	0 · Medium	2 · Medium	2 · High	0 · Critical
3	0 · Low	0 · Low	3 · Medium	0 · Medium	0 · High
2	0 · Low	0 · Low	0 · Low	0 · Medium	1 · Medium
1	0 · Low	0 · Low	0 · Low	0 · Low	0 · Low

Top risks

Latest on this portfolio

14 October 2026

Approval: Project Approval Committee Rework DEC-2026-038Public financial management system plan sent back for rework
10:00