AI insight
Every active project in the portfolio is on track
No project is off track or critical; the weakest health dimension is “Risk” at 40.
Portfolio · PF-SUS
The Aleppo substations and the Qalamoun solar field, the As-Suwayda and Madinat al-Salam water networks, and the Baniyas pilot desalination plant.
incl. SYP 550M unallocated reserve
70% of budget
Estimate at completion
10% realised
was 66 in May
Manager
Eng. Rami Youssef
Director, Renewable Energy & Environment Projects
Owner
Salma Al-Zaim
Deputy President, Finance, Administration & the Investment Plan
Programmes5 projects
Energy & Water Systems Rehabilitation Programme55%AI insight
No project is off track or critical; the weakest health dimension is “Risk” at 40.
Σ each project’s relative weight × its actual progress, under the approved project weight model
The project’s weight from the model, its relative weight among the portfolio’s counted projects, and what it adds
| Project | Project weight | Relative weight | Actual progress | Weight × progress |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aleppo 230 kV Substations Rehabilitation | 83.0 | 24.4% | 68% | 16.6% |
| 20 MW Qalamoun Solar Field | 71.0 | 20.9% | 58% | 12.1% |
| Madinat al-Salam Drinking-Water Network (Quneitra) | 65.0 | 19.1% | 97% | 18.5% |
| Suwayda Drinking-Water Network from Al-Ain Dam | 62.0 | 18.2% | 36% | 6.6% |
| Baniyas Pilot Seawater Desalination PlantSuspended — progress frozen | 59.0 | 17.4% | 6% | 1.0% |
| Portfolio progress | 54.9% | |||
54.9%
Portfolio progress = Σ (project relative weight × actual progress). Relative weight = the project’s weight ÷ the weights of the counted projects, so they add up to 100%.
The health score from eight weighted dimensions, and the schedule and cost indices over six months.
Score × weight = points
| Dimension | Score | Weight | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| Schedule | 52 | 20% | 10.4 |
| Cost | 64 | 20% | 12.8 |
| Risk | 40 | 15% | 6.0 |
| Scope | 72 | 10% | 7.2 |
| Quality | 74 | 10% | 7.4 |
| Resources | 60 | 10% | 6.0 |
| Stakeholders | 76 | 5% | 3.8 |
| Benefits | 74 | 10% | 7.4 |
| Total | 61 | ||
Health-score trend
May – October 2026
May – October 2026
0.83
Off track
Schedule performance index
Progress 55% / Planned 61%
0.90
Watch
Cost performance index
Actual spend SYP 11.8B
Both indices over time
risk across, strategic value up, bubble size by budget. Click a bubble for a quick look at the project.
Portfolio project map
Rank the projects for funding; your order is kept and goes to the 2027 planning cycle.
Portfolio priorities 2026–2027
Why the portfolio exists: the strategic objectives it serves and the KPIs its projects move.
74% achieved of a 85% target5 projects contribute
77% achieved of a 80% target2 projects contribute
Where the budget goes, why the forecast differs from it, and the value it returns.
Each programme’s gap between its projects’ budget and their forecast
| Category | Change | Running total |
|---|---|---|
| Approved budget | SYP 16.8B | SYP 16.8B |
| Unallocated reserve | −SYP 550M | SYP 16.3B |
| Energy & Water Systems Rehabilitation Programme | +SYP 1.9B | SYP 18.2B |
| Estimate at completion | SYP 18.2B | SYP 18.2B |
Budget use
SYP 27.5B
Expected value
| Category | Value | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Sustainability (ESG) | SYP 12.1B | 44% |
| Cost saving | SYP 10.5B | 38% |
| Beneficiary satisfaction | SYP 5B | 18% |
| Total | SYP 27.5B | 100% |
Value realised
SYP 2.6B
Expected value SYP 27.5B
73% of what was planned by today
A programme’s performance is computed from its projects. Click a project for a quick look.
Display options
| Aleppo 230 kV Substations RehabilitationPRJ-2026-004 | PG-09 | 4Execution | Critical | 68% | 24.4% | P1P1 · Top priority — score 87 of 100 | SYP10.3B | SYP12.3B+19.0% | 0.74Schedule performance index · 0.74 | 0.84Cost performance index · 0.84 | Risk score · Weak |
| 20 MW Qalamoun Solar FieldPRJ-2026-010 | PG-09 | 4Execution | On track | 58% | 20.9% | P1P1 · Top priority — score 83 of 100 | SYP2.4B | SYP2.4B−1.0% | 1.02Schedule performance index · 1.02 | 1.01Cost performance index · 1.01 | Risk score · Good |
| Madinat al-Salam Drinking-Water Network (Quneitra)PRJ-2026-036 | PG-09 | 5Closure | On track | 97% | 19.1% | P2P2 · High priority — score 69 of 100 | SYP1.7B | SYP1.7B−1.0% | 0.98Schedule performance index · 0.98 | 1.01Cost performance index · 1.01 | Risk score · Excellent |
| Suwayda Drinking-Water Network from Al-Ain DamPRJ-2026-025 | PG-09 | 4Execution | On track | 36% | 18.2% | P2P2 · High priority — score 70 of 100 | SYP1.1B | SYP1B−2.0% | 1.03Schedule performance index · 1.03 | 1.02Cost performance index · 1.02 | Risk score · Good |
| Baniyas Pilot Seawater Desalination PlantPRJ-2026-026 | PG-09 | 3Planning | On hold | 8% | 17.4% | P3P3 · Medium priority — score 58 of 100 | SYP825M | SYP825M0.0% | 0.89Schedule performance index · 0.89 | 1.00Cost performance index · 1.00 | Risk score · Weak |
| Total · 5 | SYP16.3B | SYP18.2B |
Open threats across the portfolio’s projects. Click a cell on the map to filter the list.
5 risks
Impact
| Probability \ Impact | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 0 · Low | 0 · Medium | 0 · High | 0 · Critical | 1 · Critical |
| 4 | 0 · Low | 0 · Medium | 0 · Medium | 1 · High | 0 · Critical |
| 3 | 0 · Low | 0 · Low | 0 · Medium | 1 · Medium | 1 · High |
| 2 | 0 · Low | 0 · Low | 1 · Low | 0 · Medium | 0 · Medium |
| 1 | 0 · Low | 0 · Low | 0 · Low | 0 · Low | 0 · Low |
Top risks
Rejection: Authority Executive Council Hold DEC-2026-035Baniyas pilot plant suspended until the allocation is confirmed
2026-10-06 10:00Gate decision: Project Approval Committee Go DEC-2026-034Mid-execution review passed for the Qalamoun solar field
2026-09-30 10:00Approval: Authority Executive Council Approved DEC-2026-032Task force formed for the Aleppo substations contractor’s distress
2026-09-22 10:00