Planning and Statistics AuthorityMunjaz11My actionsNotificationsالعربية

Portfolio · PF-SUS

Energy & Water Portfolio

Off track

The Aleppo substations and the Qalamoun solar field, the As-Suwayda and Madinat al-Salam water networks, and the Baniyas pilot desalination plant.

What-if scenarios
Approved budget
SYP 16.8B

incl. SYP 550M unallocated reserve

Actual spend
SYP 11.8B

⁦70%⁩ of budget

EAC
SYP 18.2B+8.0%

Estimate at completion

Expected value
SYP 27.5B

⁦10%⁩ realised

Health score
61−5

was ⁦66⁩ in May

Manager

Eng. Rami Youssef

Director, Renewable Energy & Environment Projects

Owner

Salma Al-Zaim

Deputy President, Finance, Administration & the Investment Plan

Programmes5 projects

Energy & Water Systems Rehabilitation Programme⁦55%⁩
On track 3Critical 1On hold 1

AI insight

Every active project in the portfolio is on track

No project is off track or critical; the weakest health dimension is “Risk” at ⁦40⁩.

Confidence⁦78%⁩

Weighted portfolio progress

Σ each project’s relative weight × its actual progress, under the approved project weight model

What each project adds to portfolio progress

The project’s weight from the model, its relative weight among the portfolio’s counted projects, and what it adds

ProjectProject weightRelative weightActual progressWeight × progress
Aleppo 230 kV Substations Rehabilitation83.0⁦24.4%⁩⁦68%⁩⁦16.6%⁩
20 MW Qalamoun Solar Field71.0⁦20.9%⁩⁦58%⁩⁦12.1%⁩
Madinat al-Salam Drinking-Water Network (Quneitra)65.0⁦19.1%⁩⁦97%⁩⁦18.5%⁩
Suwayda Drinking-Water Network from Al-Ain Dam62.0⁦18.2%⁩⁦36%⁩⁦6.6%⁩
Baniyas Pilot Seawater Desalination PlantSuspended — progress frozen59.0⁦17.4%⁩⁦6%⁩⁦1.0%⁩
Portfolio progress⁦54.9%⁩

How it is computed

⁦54.9%⁩

Portfolio progress = Σ (project relative weight × actual progress). Relative weight = the project’s weight ÷ the weights of the counted projects, so they add up to 100%.

  • · Proposed and cancelled projects never count.
  • · Left out of this portfolio now: ⁦0⁩
  • · For comparison: weighting by budget alone gives ⁦64.4%⁩

Suspended projects

Open the project weight model

Portfolio health & performance

The health score from eight weighted dimensions, and the schedule and cost indices over six months.

Health-score breakdown

Score × weight = points

61At risk
DimensionScoreWeightPoints
Schedule52⁦20%⁩10.4
Cost64⁦20%⁩12.8
Risk40⁦15%⁩6.0
Scope72⁦10%⁩7.2
Quality74⁦10%⁩7.4
Resources60⁦10%⁩6.0
Stakeholders76⁦5%⁩3.8
Benefits74⁦10%⁩7.4
Total61

Health-score trend

May – October 2026

6661

Financial & schedule performance

May – October 2026

Both indices over time

  • Schedule performance index
  • Cost performance index

Portfolio project map

risk across, strategic value up, bubble size by budget. Click a bubble for a quick look at the project.

Portfolio project map

  • On track
  • Critical
  • On hold
Approved budget · SYP 10.3B

Funding priority order

Rank the projects for funding; your order is kept and goes to the 2027 planning cycle.

  1. 1Aleppo 230 kV Substations RehabilitationPRJ-2026-004·Priority score 87Critical
  2. 220 MW Qalamoun Solar FieldPRJ-2026-010·Priority score 83On track
  3. 3Suwayda Drinking-Water Network from Al-Ain DamPRJ-2026-025·Priority score 70On track
  4. 4Madinat al-Salam Drinking-Water Network (Quneitra)PRJ-2026-036·Priority score 69On track
  5. 5Baniyas Pilot Seawater Desalination PlantPRJ-2026-026·Priority score 58On hold

Portfolio priorities 2026–2027

  • Rescue the Aleppo substations rehabilitationCritical — an Executive Council task force is in place.
  • Lift rehabilitated power and water stations in the governorates to 55%43% today — behind the path to the 2027 target.
  • Secure funding for the Baniyas pilot desalination plantOn hold since the Executive Council’s 6 October decision.

Objectives & KPIs

Why the portfolio exists: the strategic objectives it serves and the KPIs its projects move.

Budget & value

Where the budget goes, why the forecast differs from it, and the value it returns.

From approved budget to estimate at completion

Each programme’s gap between its projects’ budget and their forecast

From approved budget to estimate at completion
  • Total
  • Increase
  • Decrease
From approved budget to estimate at completion
CategoryChangeRunning total
Approved budgetSYP 16.8BSYP 16.8B
Unallocated reserve−SYP 550MSYP 16.3B
Energy & Water Systems Rehabilitation Programme+SYP 1.9BSYP 18.2B
Estimate at completionSYP 18.2BSYP 18.2B

Budget use

SYP11.8B/ SYP16.8BSYP1.4Bprojected overrun(⁦8.0%⁩)
Actual spend
SYP11.8B
Committed
SYP14.9B
Approved budget
SYP16.8B
Estimate at completion
SYP18.2B

Expected-value mix

Expected-value mix

SYP 27.5B

Expected value

  • Sustainability (ESG)SYP 12.1B⁦44%⁩
  • Cost savingSYP 10.5B⁦38%⁩
  • Beneficiary satisfactionSYP 5B⁦18%⁩
Expected-value mix
CategoryValueShare
Sustainability (ESG)SYP 12.1B⁦44%⁩
Cost savingSYP 10.5B⁦38%⁩
Beneficiary satisfactionSYP 5B⁦18%⁩
TotalSYP 27.5B⁦100%⁩

SYP 2.6B

Expected value SYP 27.5B

⁦73%⁩ of what was planned by today

Programmes & projects

A programme’s performance is computed from its projects. Click a project for a quick look.

⁦5⁩ results
Export CSV
Aleppo 230 kV Substations RehabilitationPRJ-2026-004PG-094ExecutionCritical⁦68%⁩⁦24.4%⁩P1P1 · Top priority — score ⁦87⁩ of 100SYP10.3BSYP12.3B⁦+19.0%⁩0.74Schedule performance index · 0.740.84Cost performance index · 0.84Risk score · Weak
20 MW Qalamoun Solar FieldPRJ-2026-010PG-094ExecutionOn track⁦58%⁩⁦20.9%⁩P1P1 · Top priority — score ⁦83⁩ of 100SYP2.4BSYP2.4B⁦−1.0%⁩1.02Schedule performance index · 1.021.01Cost performance index · 1.01Risk score · Good
Madinat al-Salam Drinking-Water Network (Quneitra)PRJ-2026-036PG-095ClosureOn track⁦97%⁩⁦19.1%⁩P2P2 · High priority — score ⁦69⁩ of 100SYP1.7BSYP1.7B⁦−1.0%⁩0.98Schedule performance index · 0.981.01Cost performance index · 1.01Risk score · Excellent
Suwayda Drinking-Water Network from Al-Ain DamPRJ-2026-025PG-094ExecutionOn track⁦36%⁩⁦18.2%⁩P2P2 · High priority — score ⁦70⁩ of 100SYP1.1BSYP1B⁦−2.0%⁩1.03Schedule performance index · 1.031.02Cost performance index · 1.02Risk score · Good
Baniyas Pilot Seawater Desalination PlantPRJ-2026-026PG-093PlanningOn hold⁦8%⁩⁦17.4%⁩P3P3 · Medium priority — score ⁦58⁩ of 100SYP825MSYP825M⁦0.0%⁩0.89Schedule performance index · 0.891.00Cost performance index · 1.00Risk score · Weak
Total · 5SYP16.3BSYP18.2B
⁦1⁩–⁦5⁩ of ⁦5⁩

Portfolio risks

Open threats across the portfolio’s projects. Click a cell on the map to filter the list.

Latest on this portfolio

6 October 2026

  1. Rejection: Authority Executive Council Hold DEC-2026-035Baniyas pilot plant suspended until the allocation is confirmed

    2026-10-06 10:00

30 September 2026

  1. Gate decision: Project Approval Committee Go DEC-2026-034Mid-execution review passed for the Qalamoun solar field

    2026-09-30 10:00

22 September 2026

  1. Approval: Authority Executive Council Approved DEC-2026-032Task force formed for the Aleppo substations contractor’s distress

    2026-09-22 10:00
Esc

Quick actions

Go to

Projects

↑↓to move↵to openEscto close