Proposal
Project proposal & feasibility study
Justification, objectives, benefits, cost and initial risks
- Form no.
- PSA-PMO-F01
- Template edition
- 2.1
- Version
- V2
- Form date
- 2024-02-04
Auto-filled — Filled by the platform from the project record, not typed.
- Project code
- PRJ-2026-006
- Project
- Sheikh Najjar Industrial City Rehabilitation
- Portfolio
- Health, Education & Industrial Recovery Portfolio
- Sector
- Local Development & Governorates Sector
- Sponsor
- Eng. Bashir Al-Tai
- Project manager
- Eng. Youssef Shehabi
1The proposalAuto-filled
- TitleAuto-filled
- Sheikh Najjar Industrial City Rehabilitation
- Proposed byAuto-filled
- Eng. Youssef Shehabi
- DepartmentAuto-filled
- Governorate Projects Directorate
- Submitted onAuto-filled
- 2024-02-04
- Proposal numberAuto-filled
- DMD-2026-006
2Justification
Rehabilitating Sheikh Najjar Industrial City’s infrastructure — internal roads, water and drainage networks, power stations and ground improvement on damaged plots — so factories can resume production.
3Objectives
- Stimulate growth, restore production and attract investment
- Rehabilitate core energy, water and transport infrastructure
Strategic objectives served
- SO-1.1 — Stimulate growth, restore production and attract investment
- SO-2.1 — Rehabilitate core energy, water and transport infrastructure
4Expected benefits
| Kind | Benefit |
|---|---|
| No benefits recorded yet | |
5Cost & feasibility
Estimated cost
SYP 7.2B
Funding
The delivering body’s investment-plan allocations
| Cost line | Amount |
|---|---|
| Main contract | SYP 5.1B |
| Supervision & consulting | SYP 1B |
| Internal team | SYP 642.5M |
| Contingency reserve (5%) | SYP 357.5M |
| Total | SYP 7.2B |
6Initial risks
| Risk | Level | Proposed response |
|---|---|---|
| Ground-improvement costs up after the geotechnical survey | High | Treated in the risk management plan |
| Late works approvals from Aleppo Governorate | Medium | Treated in the risk management plan |
Approval logChain: Proposal & feasibility approval · version 4
Every decision on the form — who, their role, the note and the time. It prints with the form.
| # | Step | Kind | Name | Decision | Note | Date & time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Author | — | Eng. Youssef ShehabiSenior Project Manager — Governorate Projects | Submitted | — | 2024-02-04 14:59 |
| 2 | Line manager endorsement | Technical acceptance | Eng. Lina Al-AttarThe requester’s line manager | Approved | — | 2024-02-06 12:09 |
| 3 | PMO review | Methodology review | Mariam Al-ZoubiPMO — analyst | Approved | — | 2024-02-08 13:16 |
| 4 | Portfolio manager review | Technical acceptance | Eng. Fadi Al-DroubiPortfolio manager | Approved | Consistent with the portfolio plan and its priorities. | 2024-02-13 14:23 |
| 5 | Cost & funding review | Financial approval | Rasha Al-MudarresFinance | Approved | — | 2024-02-15 14:35 |
| 6 | Project Approval Committee | Technical acceptance | Dr. Reem Al-QabbaniProject Approval Committee | Approved | — | 2024-02-19 10:37 |
Signatures
Line manager endorsement
Eng. Lina Al-Attar
Approved2024-02-06
PMO review
Mariam Al-Zoubi
Approved2024-02-08
Portfolio manager review
Eng. Fadi Al-Droubi
Approved2024-02-13
Cost & funding review
Rasha Al-Mudarres
Approved2024-02-15
Project Approval Committee
Dr. Reem Al-Qabbani
Approved2024-02-19