Objective achievement, pillar performance, KPIs and key results, the objectives and initiatives that lag, and the strategic risks — for each measurement period.
Average of the six pillars
of 12 strategic objectives
of 30 KPIs
Confidence 6.6 of 10
of 15 initiatives
of 13 on the register
Shown by your permissionsProject Management Office: 36 projects — everything in your scope
AI insight
The pillar achieves 85.3% against 90.7% for the strategy in «October 2026 (latest)». Its weakest objective is «Rebuild damaged areas and provide replacement housing», and the KPI furthest from target is «Damaged neighbourhoods covered by reconstruction plans». The highest strategic risk on it: «The Darayya replacement housing overruns its cost and schedule».
Each pillar with its objectives’ achievement against the «October 2026 (latest)» targets and the change since the previous period. Click an objective to drill into its KPIs, initiatives and projects.
Economic Recovery & Monetary Stability
2 objectives
Reconstruction & Infrastructure
2 objectives
Human Development
2 objectives
Food Security & Rural Development
2 objectives
Governance & Digital Transformation
2 objectives
Balanced Local Development across the Governorates
2 objectives
The thirty KPIs against the period target, and this quarter’s OKR results at Authority and directorate level — click a KPI or a result for its detail.
Reading vs the «October 2026 (latest)» target · by pillar
Economic Recovery & Monetary Stability
Reconstruction & Infrastructure
Human Development
Food Security & Rural Development
Governance & Digital Transformation
Balanced Local Development across the Governorates
Progress from the starting point to the target, and the owner’s confidence at the last check-in
What needs action now: objectives below the period target, initiatives behind their plan, and late operational activities.
Each initiative’s progress from its projects and other work against what was planned by today, and each directorate’s operational plan execution.
Initiative progress vs plan
% · from their linked projects at the approved contribution shares
Average activity progress against plan to date
The Authority’s plan-level risks linked to objectives, initiatives and KPIs, and the open project issues that touch the objectives.
Probability × impact — click a cell to filter the register
Impact
| Probability \ Impact | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 0 · Low | 0 · Medium | 0 · High | 0 · Critical | 0 · Critical |
| 4 | 0 · Low | 0 · Medium | 1 · Medium | 1 · High | 0 · Critical |
| 3 | 0 · Low | 1 · Low | 2 · Medium | 1 · Medium | 1 · High |
| 2 | 0 · Low | 0 · Low | 2 · Low | 2 · Medium | 1 · Medium |
| 1 | 0 · Low | 0 · Low | 1 · Low | 0 · Low | 0 · Low |
Citizen satisfaction with digital services falls as the unified platform slips
Response: Phased launch of the most-used civil-registry services before end of November
Touches:
The Darayya replacement housing overruns its cost and schedule
Response: Value engineering on facades and finishes
Touches:
Neighbourhood and governorate plans slow to be approved locally
Response: The plan tracker open to the governorate councils
Touches:
Incomplete project data misleads portfolio decisions
Response: A mandatory update before every steering committee
Touches:
Changes to the legislation on public contracts and investment
Response: Monthly regulatory watch and an impact memo
Touches:
Losing digital and statistics talent
Response: Specialist development tracks and retention incentives
Touches:
Late cloud migration and disaster recovery readiness
Response: A wave-based migration plan with a rollback test
Touches:
A reconstruction funding gap as attracted investment slows
Response: Multi-year funding agreements with the Syrian Development Fund
Touches:
A cyber incident that stops government e-services or exposes citizen data
Response: Test the disaster recovery plan
Touches:
Trust in digital government services falls after a service failure
Response: A crisis communication guide and a rapid-response team
Touches:
Statistical data quality and its reliance on ministry sources
Response: Data-sharing agreements with service levels
Touches:
Parallel government portals split citizens’ attention
Response: One service catalogue and mandatory links through the national interoperability framework
Touches:
Late equipment for rehabilitated schools and hospitals
Response: A framework supply agreement through the General Authority for Supply and Provision
Touches:
Open high-impact issues on projects linked to a strategic objective
