Maarat al-Numan Infrastructure Rehabilitation — with Idlib Governorate
Add to watchlistRehabilitating roads, water and drainage networks and street lighting in Maarat al-Numan with Idlib Governorate, so residents and public services can return.
Budget (BAC)
Actual cost
34% of budget
Progress
Estimate at completion
+SYP 247.9M
SPI · CPI
Forecast finish
28 days behind baseline
ExecutionStage 4 of 5
Next gate:Closure29 June 2027
- Pre-start · CompletePre-start · Complete
- Gate into «Initiation»DecisionGoDate7 May 2025Initiation · CompleteInitiation · Complete
- Gate into «Planning»DecisionGoDate6 July 2025Planning · CompletePlanning · Complete
- Gate into «Execution»DecisionGoDate9 November 2025Execution · Current stageExecution · Current stage
- Gate into «Closure»DecisionNot held yetDate29 June 2027Closure · Not startedClosure · Not started
Finance & earned value
The full budget structure, cost broken down by eight dimensions, cash flow with its S-curve, and earned-value indicators with an automatic end-of-project forecast.
Budget anatomy
The approved SYP 6B split into spent, committed and left, with the estimate at completion
- Actual spendSYP 2B
- Committed, not spentSYP 3.1B
- Allotted, uncommittedSYP 646.5M
- Contingency availableSYP 178.5M
Budget
- EstimatedManualFrom the project proposal — not from the finance systemthe proposal’s cost before approval
- SYP 5.1B
- Original budgetwhen the first baseline was approved
- SYP 6B
- Approved budgetafter approved change requests
- SYP 6B
- Current budgetavailable to spend now
- SYP 6B
- Revised budgetif the pending changes are approved
- SYP 6B
Commitments
- CommitmentsSyncedFrom the nightly finance-system syncsigned contracts and purchase orders
- SYP 5.1B
- Contracts1 active contract
- SYP 4.9B
- Purchase orders3 orders
- SYP 225M
- Remaining budgetapproved less actual
- SYP 3.9B
Spend & outlook
- Actual costSyncedFrom the nightly finance-system syncincluding accruals
- SYP 2B
- Accrualswork done, not yet invoiced
- SYP 81.8M
- Estimate at completionManualThe project manager’s estimate — not from the finance systemthe PM’s bottom-up forecast
- SYP 6.2B
- ContingencySYP 119M drawn of SYP 297.5M
- SYP 178.5M
Estimated vs approved budget
What the project proposal estimated before approval, against today’s approved budget and the estimate at completion
- Approved is SYP 832.5M (16.3%) above the estimate
- The estimate at completion is SYP 1.1B (21.1%) above the estimate
From the «project proposal & feasibility study» approved at the approval gate on 2025-04-22 · The gap between estimated and approved comes from the scope update and the change requests approved after the approval gate.
ERP link — data readiness
The link keys are ready for the finance-system sync; Munjaz follows the project and does not replace the accounting system
- Cost centreCC-51034
- WBS elements5 elements · P-2026-034.01 …
- Purchase orders3 synced · 0 manual
- Invoices & certificates6 posted · 1 in approval
Where each figure comes from
- EstimatedManualFrom the project proposal — not from the finance system
- CommitmentsSyncedFrom the nightly finance-system sync
- Actual costSyncedFrom the nightly finance-system sync
- Estimate at completionManualThe project manager’s estimate — not from the finance system
Once the link is live, synced figures are read from the finance system; manual updates stay available to the same roles and are logged.
Purchase-order registerManual edit log
Every manual update — who, when, why and from which source
No manual edits on this project
All its figures come from the finance-system sync. Finance & procurement — and the project manager, for the estimate at completion — can update them by hand.
Budget bridge
From the original to the revised request
- Total
- Increase
- Decrease
Contingency draw-downs
SYP 119M drawn of SYP 297.5M
- Covering realised delivery risks2026-08-29SYP 119M
Purchase orders
- PO-2026-0894Site monitoring and communications systemsSYP 67.5MSYP 10.1M paid
- PO-2026-0781Office furniture, fit-out and site suppliesSYP 108MSYP 48.6M paid
- PO-2025-0668Materials and soil laboratory testsSYP 49.5MSYP 49.5M paid
Cost breakdown structure
Every dimension adds up to the same totals
| Item | BudgetSYP M | CommittedSYP M | ActualSYP M | EACSYP M | VarianceSYP M | Consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Management & governance | 346.29 | 372.48 | 372.48 | 372.48 | −26.19 | |
| 2Design & permits | 692.58 | 744.95 | 744.95 | 744.95 | −52.37 | |
| 3Civil works | 2,193.17 | 1,952.05 | 927.88 | 2,279.17 | −86.00 | |
| 4MEP works | 1,731.45 | 1,401.49 | 0.00 | 1,849.14 | −117.69 | |
| 5Handover | 808.01 | 654.03 | 0.00 | 862.93 | −54.92 | |
| Unallocated contingency | 178.50 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 89.25 | +89.25 | |
| Total | 5,950.00 | 5,125.00 | 2,045.31 | 6,197.92 | −247.92 |
Budget split
WBS
SYP 6B
Budget
- Management & governanceSYP 346.3M6%
- Design & permitsSYP 692.6M12%
- Civil worksSYP 2.2B37%
- MEP worksSYP 1.7B29%
- HandoverSYP 808M14%
- Unallocated contingencySYP 178.5M3%
Cash flow
Planned, committed, actual and forecast
Spend per period
SYP millions
- Planned
- Actual
- Forecast
Cumulative S-curve
Cumulative to close
- Actual, then forecast
- Planned, cumulative
- Committed, cumulative
- Forecast
Earned value management
At the data date 2026-10-28
Planned value, earned value and actual cost
- Planned value
- Earned value
- Actual cost
- Estimate at completion
- Budget at completion
0.49
Off track
Schedule performance index
SPI = EV ÷ PV
0.96
On track
Cost performance index
CPI = EV ÷ AC
Finish by earned schedule
2028-12-15+472
SPI(t) 0.63 against the approved finish 2027-08-31
- Planned valuePV
- SYP 4B
- The value of the work that should be done by today.
- PV
- Earned valueEV
- SYP 2B
- The value of the work actually done, at plan prices.
- EV = % complete × BAC
- Actual costAC
- SYP 2B
- What has actually been spent on the work done.
- AC
- Budget at completionBAC
- SYP 6B
- The approved budget for the whole project.
- BAC
- Cost varianceCV
- −81.81 SYP M
- Earned less actual; negative means paying more than the value.
- CV = EV − AC
- Schedule varianceSV
- −2,023.03 SYP M
- Earned less planned; negative means behind, in value.
- SV = EV − PV
- Cost performance indexCPI
- 0.96
- Value produced per pound spent; under 1 is an overrun.
- CPI = EV ÷ AC
- Schedule performance indexSPI
- 0.49
- Work done over work planned; under 1 is behind.
- SPI = EV ÷ PV
- Estimate at completionEAC
- SYP 6.2B
- What the project will cost when it finishes, as forecast.
- EAC = BAC ÷ CPI
- Estimate to completeETC
- SYP 4.2B
- What is still to be spent to completion.
- ETC = EAC − AC
- Variance at completionVAC
- −247.92 SYP M
- Budget less the estimate; negative is an overrun.
- VAC = BAC − EAC
- To-complete performance indexTCPI
- 1.02
- The cost efficiency the rest must reach to stay on budget.
- TCPI = (BAC − EV) ÷ (BAC − AC)
Automatic end-of-project forecast
Four ways to estimate the final cost, and the date earned schedule points to
- At today’s cost performanceSYP 6.2B
- If the rest goes to planSYP 6B
- At cost and schedule performanceSYP 10.5B
- The PM’s bottom-up estimateSYP 6.2B
- To stay within SYP 6B, cost performance on the rest must rise to 1.02 — above what has been achieved.
Estimate at completion at that performance
SYP 6.2B
Variance at completion: −247.92 SYP M