PRJ-2026-017At risk5ClosureWaterfallIn progressDelivered by:Ministry of Finance

Ministry of Finance e-Archiving

Electronic archiving of the Ministry of Finance’s documents and financial correspondence, with a workflow for administrative correspondence and one search across the archive.

Project managerNour Al-JabiriProject sponsorSalma Al-ZaimProgrammeIntegrated Government Systems Programme

Budget (BAC)

SYP 355M

Actual cost

SYP 337.3M

⁦95%⁩ of budget

Progress

⁦95%⁩Awaiting acceptance ⁦5%⁩

Estimate at completion

SYP 355M

SPI · CPI

0.951.00

Forecast finish

⁦2026-11-15⁩

46 days behind baseline

ClosureStage ⁦5⁩ of ⁦5⁩

Pre-start · Complete
Initiation · Complete
Planning · Complete
Execution · Complete
Closure · Current stage

Change request

The change, its impact analysis and the approval decision

Electronic forms

MunjazStrategy & projects

MunjazPMO PLATFORM

Execution

Change request

The change, its impact analysis and the approval decision

Form no.: PSA-PMO-F09
Template edition: 3.1
Version: V1
Form date: ⁦2026-08-11⁩

RejectedCR-2026-015Add a classified-correspondence archive module

Auto-filled — Filled by the platform from the project record, not typed.

Project code: PRJ-2026-017
Project: Ministry of Finance e-Archiving
Portfolio: Government Digital Infrastructure & Systems Portfolio
Sector: Digital Transformation Sector
Sponsor: Salma Al-Zaim
Project manager: Nour Al-Jabiri

1The change

TitleAuto-filled: Add a classified-correspondence archive module
KindAuto-filled: Deliverables
Requested byAuto-filled: Nour Al-Jabiri
Raised onAuto-filled: ⁦2026-08-11⁩

Reason

A request to add a classified-correspondence module

Justification

Classified correspondence is handled on paper today

2Impact analysis

Cost

+SYP 16.3M

Schedule

+30 days

Risk

9 → 15

Benefits

+1%

Risk impact

Adds heavy security requirements at handover

Benefits impact

Limited: under 2% of correspondence

3The approval decision

The PMO’s recommendation

The national PMO recommends rejection; run the module as its own project

Change Committee decision: Reject
Decided on: ⁦2026-08-25⁩
Decision number: DEC-2026-023

Approval logChain: Change request approval · version ⁦5⁩

Every decision on the form — who, their role, the note and the time. It prints with the form.

#	Step	Kind	Name	Decision	Note	Date & time
1	Author	—	Nour Al-JabiriDirector, Government Systems & Integration	Submitted	—	⁦2026-08-11⁩ 09:24
2	Project manager	Technical acceptance	Nour Al-JabiriProject manager	Approved	—	⁦2026-08-12⁩ 11:08
3	PMO review & impact analysis	Methodology review	Mariam Al-ZoubiPMO — analyst	Approved	—	⁦2026-08-16⁩ 12:15
4	Financial impact	Financial approval	Rasha Al-MudarresFinance	Approved	—	⁦2026-08-18⁩ 10:43
5	Change Committee	Technical acceptance	Dr. Ziad Al-AtassiChange Committee	Rejected	—	⁦2026-08-19⁩ 09:36

Signatures

Project manager

Nour Al-Jabiri

Approved⁦2026-08-12⁩

PMO review & impact analysis

Mariam Al-Zoubi

Approved⁦2026-08-16⁩

Financial impact

Rasha Al-Mudarres

Approved⁦2026-08-18⁩

Change Committee

Dr. Ziad Al-Atassi

Rejected⁦2026-08-19⁩

Change request

Prints the form and its approval log on A4.

The request in Change requests

Approval path

Read from the approval engine: the steps, their holders and the time limits in working days.

The chain in the approval engine

Chain: Change request approval · version ⁦5⁩

Submitted by Nour Al-Jabiri on ⁦2026-08-11⁩

Technical acceptance
Project manager
Nour Al-Jabiri · Project manager
Approved · ⁦2026-08-12⁩ at ⁦11:08⁩
Methodology review
PMO review & impact analysis
Mariam Al-Zoubi · PMO — analyst
Approved · ⁦2026-08-16⁩ at ⁦12:15⁩
Financial approval
Financial impact
Rasha Al-Mudarres · Finance
On the path because: Financial link?
Approved · ⁦2026-08-18⁩ at ⁦10:43⁩
Technical acceptance
Change Committee
Dr. Ziad Al-Atassi · Change Committee
Delegated to Dr. Reem Al-Qabbani
Rejected · ⁦2026-08-19⁩ at ⁦09:36⁩

Steps that do not apply to this record

Contractual impact — the condition «Contract link?» does not hold
National Projects Steering Committee — the condition «Cost impact above the Change Committee’s authority?» does not holdFrom the authority matrix
Authority Executive Council — the condition «Cost impact above the Steering Committee’s authority?» does not holdFrom the authority matrix

The form was rejected and its path closed.

Previous versions

Every version is kept with its status and what changed.

V1RejectedCurrent⁦2026-08-11⁩
The request as raised
Nour Al-Jabiri

Only one version so far.