Damascus–Daraa Highway (Southern M5) — Lighting & Smart Signals
Add to watchlistSolar lighting for the highway between As-Sanamayn and Daraa: 1,200 lighting poles and traffic cameras, smart signals at the junctions and a traffic control room in Daraa.
Budget (BAC)
Actual cost
84% of budget
Progress
Estimate at completion
+SYP 118.1M
SPI · CPI
Forecast finish
45 days behind baseline
ExecutionStage 4 of 5
Next gate:Closure11 September 2026
- Pre-start · CompletePre-start · Complete
- Gate into «Initiation»DecisionGoDate18 December 2024Initiation · CompleteInitiation · Complete
- Gate into «Planning»DecisionGoDate16 February 2025Planning · CompletePlanning · Complete
- Gate into «Execution»DecisionConditional goDate27 May 2025Execution · Current stageExecution · Current stage
- Gate into «Closure»DecisionNot held yetDate11 September 2026Closure · Not startedClosure · Not started
Finance & earned value
The full budget structure, cost broken down by eight dimensions, cash flow with its S-curve, and earned-value indicators with an automatic end-of-project forecast.
Budget anatomy
The approved SYP 1.9B split into spent, committed and left, with the estimate at completion
- Actual spendSYP 1.6B
- Committed, not spentSYP 165.2M
- Allotted, uncommittedSYP 74.5M
- Contingency availableSYP 55.5M
Budget
- EstimatedManualFrom the project proposal — not from the finance systemthe proposal’s cost before approval
- SYP 1.7B
- Original budgetwhen the first baseline was approved
- SYP 1.9B
- Approved budgetafter approved change requests
- SYP 1.9B
- Current budgetavailable to spend now
- SYP 1.9B
- Revised budgetif the pending changes are approved
- SYP 1.9B
Commitments
- CommitmentsSyncedFrom the nightly finance-system syncsigned contracts and purchase orders
- SYP 1.7B
- Contracts1 active contract
- SYP 1.5B
- Purchase orders3 orders
- SYP 182.5M
- Remaining budgetapproved less actual
- SYP 295.2M
Spend & outlook
- Actual costSyncedFrom the nightly finance-system syncincluding accruals
- SYP 1.6B
- Accrualswork done, not yet invoiced
- SYP 62.2M
- Estimate at completionManualThe project manager’s estimate — not from the finance systemthe PM’s bottom-up forecast
- SYP 2B
- ContingencySYP 37M drawn of SYP 92.5M
- SYP 55.5M
Estimated vs approved budget
What the project proposal estimated before approval, against today’s approved budget and the estimate at completion
- Approved is SYP 167.5M (10.0%) above the estimate
- The estimate at completion is SYP 285.6M (17.0%) above the estimate
From the «project proposal & feasibility study» approved at the approval gate on 2024-12-03 · The gap between estimated and approved comes from the scope update and the change requests approved after the approval gate.
ERP link — data readiness
The link keys are ready for the finance-system sync; Munjaz follows the project and does not replace the accounting system
- Cost centreCC-51013
- WBS elements5 elements · P-2026-013.01 …
- Purchase orders3 synced · 0 manual
- Invoices & certificates14 posted · 0 in approval
Where each figure comes from
- EstimatedManualFrom the project proposal — not from the finance system
- CommitmentsSyncedFrom the nightly finance-system sync
- Actual costSyncedFrom the nightly finance-system sync
- Estimate at completionManualThe project manager’s estimate — not from the finance system
Once the link is live, synced figures are read from the finance system; manual updates stay available to the same roles and are logged.
Purchase-order registerManual edit log
Every manual update — who, when, why and from which source
No manual edits on this project
All its figures come from the finance-system sync. Finance & procurement — and the project manager, for the estimate at completion — can update them by hand.
Budget bridge
From the original to the revised request
- Total
- Increase
- Decrease
Contingency draw-downs
SYP 37M drawn of SYP 92.5M
- Covering realised delivery risks2026-08-29SYP 37M
Purchase orders
- PO-2026-0907Site monitoring and communications systemsSYP 54.8MSYP 8.2M paid
- PO-2026-0794Office furniture, fit-out and site suppliesSYP 87.6MSYP 39.4M paid
- PO-2025-0681Materials and soil laboratory testsSYP 40.2MSYP 40.2M paid
Cost breakdown structure
Every dimension adds up to the same totals
| Item | BudgetSYP M | CommittedSYP M | ActualSYP M | EACSYP M | VarianceSYP M | Consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Management & governance | 107.67 | 118.09 | 118.09 | 118.09 | −10.42 | |
| 2Design & permits | 215.34 | 236.17 | 236.17 | 236.17 | −20.83 | |
| 3Civil works | 681.91 | 747.87 | 747.87 | 747.87 | −65.96 | |
| 4MEP works | 538.35 | 494.68 | 452.66 | 550.72 | −12.37 | |
| 5Handover | 251.23 | 123.19 | 0.00 | 287.49 | −36.26 | |
| Unallocated contingency | 55.50 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 27.75 | +27.75 | |
| Total | 1,850.00 | 1,720.00 | 1,554.79 | 1,968.09 | −118.09 |
Budget split
WBS
SYP 1.9B
Budget
- Management & governanceSYP 107.7M6%
- Design & permitsSYP 215.3M12%
- Civil worksSYP 681.9M37%
- MEP worksSYP 538.4M29%
- HandoverSYP 251.2M14%
- Unallocated contingencySYP 55.5M3%
Cash flow
Planned, committed, actual and forecast
Spend per period
SYP millions
- Planned
- Actual
- Forecast
Cumulative S-curve
Cumulative to close
- Actual, then forecast
- Planned, cumulative
- Committed, cumulative
Earned value management
At the data date 2026-10-28
Planned value, earned value and actual cost
- Planned value
- Earned value
- Actual cost
- Estimate at completion
- Budget at completion
0.79
Off track
Schedule performance index
SPI = EV ÷ PV
0.94
Watch
Cost performance index
CPI = EV ÷ AC
Finish by earned schedule
2027-07-18+260
SPI(t) 0.71 against the approved finish 2026-10-31
- Planned valuePV
- SYP 1.9B
- The value of the work that should be done by today.
- PV
- Earned valueEV
- SYP 1.5B
- The value of the work actually done, at plan prices.
- EV = % complete × BAC
- Actual costAC
- SYP 1.6B
- What has actually been spent on the work done.
- AC
- Budget at completionBAC
- SYP 1.9B
- The approved budget for the whole project.
- BAC
- Cost varianceCV
- −93.29 SYP M
- Earned less actual; negative means paying more than the value.
- CV = EV − AC
- Schedule varianceSV
- −388.50 SYP M
- Earned less planned; negative means behind, in value.
- SV = EV − PV
- Cost performance indexCPI
- 0.94
- Value produced per pound spent; under 1 is an overrun.
- CPI = EV ÷ AC
- Schedule performance indexSPI
- 0.79
- Work done over work planned; under 1 is behind.
- SPI = EV ÷ PV
- Estimate at completionEAC
- SYP 2B
- What the project will cost when it finishes, as forecast.
- EAC = BAC ÷ CPI
- Estimate to completeETC
- SYP 413.3M
- What is still to be spent to completion.
- ETC = EAC − AC
- Variance at completionVAC
- −118.09 SYP M
- Budget less the estimate; negative is an overrun.
- VAC = BAC − EAC
- To-complete performance indexTCPI
- 1.32
- The cost efficiency the rest must reach to stay on budget.
- TCPI = (BAC − EV) ÷ (BAC − AC)
Automatic end-of-project forecast
Four ways to estimate the final cost, and the date earned schedule points to
- At today’s cost performanceSYP 2B
- If the rest goes to planSYP 1.9B
- At cost and schedule performanceSYP 2.1B
- The PM’s bottom-up estimateSYP 2B
- To stay within SYP 1.9B, cost performance on the rest must rise to 1.32 — above what has been achieved.
Estimate at completion at that performance
SYP 2B
Variance at completion: −118.08 SYP M