Planning and Statistics AuthorityMunjaz11My actionsNotificationsالعربية

Priority & weighting model

Version ⁦4⁩ · Approved

The priority criteria and weights, and the project weighting model.

Total weight

100 / 100

Total is 100 — ready to save

Value · 40%Urgency & compliance · 20%Impact · 22%Effort & risk · 18%

Criteria and weights

The eleven criteria. Weights are percentages of the score; criteria that lower priority count inverted.

Value

  • Fit with the development frameworkRaises priority

    How far the proposal moves the objectives of the 2026–2030 development framework, its six pillars and the initiatives and KPIs of the 2026–2028 medium-term plan.

    %
  • Development valueRaises priority

    The value it adds for citizens and the governorates: a public service restored, infrastructure rehabilitated or a new national capability.

    %
  • Economic & social returnRaises priority

    The economic and social return in the feasibility study, and its contribution to rationalised investment spending and restored production.

    %

Urgency & compliance

  • UrgencyRaises priority

    The cost of delay: what citizens and the beneficiary bodies lose if work does not start this year.

    %
  • Legal requirementRaises priority

    Is it required by a law, a decree, a Council of Ministers decision or a directive from a control body or the competent ministry (Ministry of Communications and IT, the Central Organisation for Financial Control)?

    %

Impact

  • Impact on citizens & beneficiariesRaises priority

    Its direct effect on citizens, returning families, students, patients and farmers: time, effort, cost and satisfaction.

    %
  • Sustainability impactRaises priority

    Its contribution to energy and water efficiency in public facilities, renewable energy and lower emissions.

    %
  • Digital transformation impactRaises priority

    Its contribution to digital government services, public-body processes and the use of statistical data.

    %

Effort & risk

  • RiskLowers priority

    Delivery, technical and contractual risk — the higher it is, the lower the priority.

    %
  • ComplexityLowers priority

    The number of bodies, governorates, systems, integrations and procedure changes involved.

    %
  • Resource requirementLowers priority

    The team, budget and scarce skills it draws from the portfolio’s capacity.

    %
Esc

Quick actions

Go to

Projects

↑↓to move↵to openEscto close